| As seen in www.camrosecanadian.com |
Charleton Heston made some iconic movies back in the day; but
probably his most notable (perhaps because I watched it every single year in
elementary) was The Ten Commandments.
However, since nothing is sacred in Hollywood anymore (pun intended),
and with the film approaching the 60th anniversary, it only made
sense that we were to see another take. Luckily
they were able to snag Ridley Scott (Gladiator) to helm this epic. And while Heston he is not, the recently
impressive Christian Bale steps into the sandals of the legendary hero, Moses
in Exodus: Gods and Kings. This will be a very condensed look as the film’s runtime
is 150 minutes.
Ramses (Joel Edgerton) is the son of the Pharaoh and next in
line for the throne, while Moses is his adopted brother. As time goes by, the Pharaoh passes away and
Ramses inherits the throne. One day,
Moses finds out about his true heritage as a Hebrew and in the process kills
two Egyptian guards. When Ramses finds
out about this he exiles Moses from the city.
Nine years pass. After an
accident, he wakes up to a vision of a burning bush and a little boy named
Malak (Isaac Andrews). Malak acts as the
Metatron (look it up) for God. He tells
Moses to go back to Egypt to free His people.
However, Ramses’ refusal and retaliation leads to war. Malak speaks to Moses again, He tells him to fall
back and watch as He releases the infamous ten plagues onto the city. Throughout
the destruction, Moses’ shaky faith is tested repeatedly, though in the end the
slaves are freed. This leads to taking
his people on an Exodus from Egypt to the Holy Land where they will be free
forever.
We all can pretty much guess what happens from here; something
about a Red Sea and words on some stone tablets. However, if you are a fan of the best-selling
book of all time (The Bible, for those unsure); you will notice some large
veering from the written word and some incredibly executed yet arguable
over-the-top CGI. The story bears the
same substance but seems to lack all the heart.
The timeline is very confusing and leaves you wondering why some parts
where cut so short while others dragged on for too long. Bale’s unfortunately
poor performance also suffers from drastic accent changes throughout the flick
leaving the viewer wondering if he was supposed to have one in the first
place. Edgerton was rather amazing
actually, but the remaining stardom that was the supporting cast were barely
given screen time let alone lines to justify a salary. Visually the product is there, but for the
spectators it’s up to them whether they will be impressed or not. Sorry Ridley, the “Passion” just wasn’t
there. Religious fanatics need not
apply.
No comments:
Post a Comment